About Don Shafer

I'm a broadcaster, community activist and pretty average guitar player. I studied English & Psychology at the University of Texas and Communications & Journalism at the University of Southern California. During the day I'm the CEO at Roundhouse Radio, Vancouver's newest radio station and most nights I am completing my MA thesis at Simon Fraser University - Climate Change and The Many Faces of Denial. I work with many not for profits and on a number of boards and committees including Variety the Children's Charity, PFLAG Vancouver, The British Columbia Institute of Technology and the Deans Advisory Board at the University of British Columbia. I volunteer with the Climate Reality Project and other environmental groups. My academic interests include depth psychology, promoting environmental justice, peace building and ecological sustainability. I am actively interested in the relationship between media, art and culture and our interconnectedness with each other and the world we share.

Impact with The David Suzuki Foundation – Brett Dolter, Jerome Laviolette, Melina Luboucan-Massimo and Harpreet Johal (October 1, 2017)

The first recipients of the newly created David Suzuki Foundation Fellowship feature conversations with Brett Dolter, Jerome Laviolette, and Melina Laboucan-Massimo. We are also joined by Harpreet Johal the DSF Senior Fellowship Specialist who shares more information about this program. I am looking forward to a fun and engaging conversation as we learn what this opportunity means as they dig into their individual interests around finance, transportation, and sustainability. I hope you can join us!

Listen Here


When looking at what’s going on in the world around us I often wonder if we are we more connected than ever and saying less in a digital age? The sounds of people screaming resonate in my dreams as I hear machine gun fire or the sounds of buildings collapsing from natures response to human activity. I wonder if a large-scale crisis whether from terrorism, a financial crash, or a catastrophic climate-related event could provide the pretext to declare a state of emergency where the usual rules no longer apply as Naomi Klein suggests. What happens if communication, media and our art, as well as some communities, are forced underground? Has the message been lost because we are too busy, or to the fear of capitalism and tyrants who routinely reduce funding, destroy art, censor, burn books, harass painters, journalists, professors, playwrights and authors? Could it happen here? Are we systematically suffocating these voices in a world distracted by capitalism, climate change, racism and socioeconomic struggle?

There have been significant benchmarks over time that question our humanity and offer a glimpse of our future. As the world seems to be racing out of control, the list of what’s wrong seems to be growing longer. I’m curious when we might give equal consideration to humans, animals and “other,” before more species slide into extinction, more forests and wetlands are obliterated, and more lives are destroyed by hunger, war, and climate change. With a growing homeless population in Vancouver, a city filled with smoke, and catastrophic hurricanes and earthquakes only hours away, our world, and our city have changed. If Sally Armstrong is right… “that there is no such thing as an innocent bystander,” what then is my role, and what is yours?

Climate Change & Future Generations

I recently attended the Climate Reality Project Leadership training in Bellevue (Seattle) Washington. It’s a not for profit organisation involved in education and advocacy and all about climate change. It was established in 2011 after the joining of two environmental groups, The Alliance for Climate Protection and The Climate Project, which were both founded in 2006 by Al Gore. Gore was the 45th Vice President of the United States and well known for his work regarding environmental issues and of course An Inconvenient Truth. Along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), they were awarded The Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for their efforts to obtain and disseminate information about the climate challenge.

Hundreds of questions emerged during this three-day event such as; must we change, can we change, and will we change? Perhaps the most confronting were my reasons for being there. When exactly had I become an environmentalist and was I a fraud among these passionate activists and friends of the earth? Oddly, I felt at home and perhaps a little like Richard Dreyfus in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. An outsider at the beginning, and feeling more like I was in the right place with family and friends as the days blended together called together for some existential reason. It was easy to talk about how I had been beckoned down this rabbit hole in school as it began with an interest in defining what wilderness is, how we treat each other – humans, animals and other, and how it moved to a broader discussion about climate change and the speed at which it is unfolding and how it is making it increasingly difficult for us to adapt in what some believe is an apocalyptic scenario. Recognizing that it may not matter what wilderness is if we can’t address these issues, there is a growing vulnerability about what to do first and in the “five alarm fire” that Naomi Klein frames in No Is Not Enough, how to effect positive social change while we figure out what to tell our kids and future generations?

Remarkably, Mr. Gore brought this home for me with his closing comment’s. (you can skip to the bottom and hear him)

“As many of you know one of the most appropriate ways to frame this choice now before us is to project ourselves into the future world that we are going to bequeath to the next generation. And when they inherit the earth that we give to them – that we pass on to them, depending on the circumstances in which they find themselves, they will ask one of two questions.

And if they find themselves in a world of steadily diminishing hope and increasing despair with political disruptions, and chaos and billions of climate refugees, threatening governance structures and social cohesion, diminished food supplies, and challenges to the availability of fresh water, deeper droughts, stronger storms, floods and mudslides, rising sea levels, tropical diseases and all of the other horrors that the scientists – who have been right in their predictions of decades ago and are now telling us we must act quickly to avoid much worse.

If they lived in a world that was careening through such catastrophes and destroying hope they would be well-justified looking back at us in this time, and in this place and asking – what were you thinking? How how did you fail to see and feel that we were at risk? How did you fail to do what was necessary, to protect God’s green earth and the conditions that could give us happiness and joy and the lives that you’d told us we deserved.

But there is another alternative if they live in a world with rising hopes with hundreds of millions of good new jobs and occupations held by men and women who are busily transforming our civilisation into a sustainable and prosperous and clean civilisation. If they see that we have turned the corner and even though they face challenges, they know that they are in the process of diminishing and that they can not only survive but continue the work that will go on to safeguard our planet. If they can look into the eyes of their own children and feel with confidence and in their hearts that those children will have better prospects still. I want them to look back through time again and ask a different question: How did you find the moral courage to stand up to change, to work, to join together and to build a future that allows humanity to achieve its destiny”?

Attempting to answer these questions lead to interesting discussions involving science, fake news, eco and social psychology, religion, domestic and foreign policy, centuries of socioeconomic inequalities around the world and a reminder from Thich Nhat Hanh, “…that only love can save us.” So what about future generations? It is not so accidental that I feel called to do whatever I can to make a difference in whatever little ways that I can. I really don’t want my kids or grand kids or yours asking me, “what were you thinking”? We have work to do!

(Al Gores closing comments from the Climate Reality Leadership Conference, Bellevue Washington June 29, 2017)

Al Gore (June 29, 2017)

Al Gore s an American politician and environmentalist who served as the 45th Vice President of the United States from 1993 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton. At the end of Clinton’s second term, Gore was picked as the Democratic nominee for the 2000 presidential election. After leaving office, Gore remained prominent as an author and environmental activist, whose work in climate change activism earned him (jointly with the IPCC) the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. He talks about ctivism, the many faces of denial and hope.

Naomi Klein (June 26, 2017)

Naomi is a Canadian author, social activist, and filmmaker known for her political analyses and criticism of corporate globalization and capitalism. She discusses her views of the world and her new book No Is Not Enough, Resisting the Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need. We talk about why we need history, politics, strategy and optimism and that another world is possible.

Ann Mortifee (June 15, 2017)

Ann discusses her career and her new musical The Mysteries. Ann is fascinated with the ancient myth of Persephone in the underworld and believes that its powerful impact on the thought leaders of western civilisation has continued through the centuries. She trusts that if we can revision the myth the impact could change the world.

Chad Frischmann (June 13, 2017)

Impact looks at Project Drawdown founded by Paul Hawken while he was writing the book Drawdown to bring together thousands of scientists to find out where we need to focus to handle Climate Change. We speak with Chad Frischmann, Project Drawdown’s Vice President and Research Director.